Baron: Comparing your two versions, the new one feels far more personal and in the minds of the characters, while the old one was stronger on the mystery part. I like the setting and the details we get of the characters, making them far easier to distinguish than in the original. Unfortunately, there is so little focus on the mystery of the island now that finding the meteor feels like a completely random event that has nothing to do with the plt at all. It's just there. Overall, both versions have flaws but combined they'd make a great story - with the more character driven approach for the second version and the more mysterious atmosphere of the first.
Stupot: Your story follows an ages old tradition of pretending it wasn't written by its author - which leads to the interesting phenomenon that your authors note at the beginning must be read as part of the story (while the one at the end in spoiler tags clearly isn't). But this necessity to treat the comment in the beginning as part of the story leads to a bit of weirdness later on: "The user who posted "Faceplant", a frequenter of the forum by the name of Stupot, seems rather unremarkable, perhaps even boring. His posts lack much substance and he seems to be a generally liked, if not particularly influential member of the community. He appears to have presented the story as his own work, not citing any sources nor acknowledging any real-world basis. Of his honesty and integrity, I have no query. I am in no doubt that he believes Faceplant emerged from his own grey matter. And yet... here we are." Soooo, you, Stupot, received this paragraph in an e-mail? The e-mail-writer didn't adress you, but wrote a paragraph about you in the third person? Yeah, sure. I mean, in the end we all know that you wrote this yourself, but the literary illusion you were going for still falls completely flat here. Nobody would write like that about the receiver of the message.
Compared to your old version of the story, there's a whole lot more here, of course. I think its slightly unfortunate that the universe seems to hate James/Simon even more than in the original. Not only was he bullied, pushed into dung, eaten by plants - no, it was also later treated as a suicide, which is very much stigmatised. There weren't even consequences for Philip, he didn't even seem to have learned a lesson from this. Even though he went to appologize, he was still kicked out of school later, so we can only assume he was still a bully or otherwise troubelmaker.
In short, the second version of your story adds so much to it that it almost becomes a different story. The core is the same (to the letter, as you quoted it) but the original was a horror creepypasta, while the second is a morality piece (with morality very much lacking.)
And the results are in:
Best improvement:
Baron: 2 points
Stupot: 1 point
Best story:
Baron: 2 points
Stupot: 4 points
Overall:
Baron: 4 points
Stupot: 5 points
(And this breakdown would have made so much more sense with more votes...)
And that means we have a winner by one single point.
Congratulations, Stupot!
You're up next!
Stupot: Your story follows an ages old tradition of pretending it wasn't written by its author - which leads to the interesting phenomenon that your authors note at the beginning must be read as part of the story (while the one at the end in spoiler tags clearly isn't). But this necessity to treat the comment in the beginning as part of the story leads to a bit of weirdness later on: "The user who posted "Faceplant", a frequenter of the forum by the name of Stupot, seems rather unremarkable, perhaps even boring. His posts lack much substance and he seems to be a generally liked, if not particularly influential member of the community. He appears to have presented the story as his own work, not citing any sources nor acknowledging any real-world basis. Of his honesty and integrity, I have no query. I am in no doubt that he believes Faceplant emerged from his own grey matter. And yet... here we are." Soooo, you, Stupot, received this paragraph in an e-mail? The e-mail-writer didn't adress you, but wrote a paragraph about you in the third person? Yeah, sure. I mean, in the end we all know that you wrote this yourself, but the literary illusion you were going for still falls completely flat here. Nobody would write like that about the receiver of the message.
Compared to your old version of the story, there's a whole lot more here, of course. I think its slightly unfortunate that the universe seems to hate James/Simon even more than in the original. Not only was he bullied, pushed into dung, eaten by plants - no, it was also later treated as a suicide, which is very much stigmatised. There weren't even consequences for Philip, he didn't even seem to have learned a lesson from this. Even though he went to appologize, he was still kicked out of school later, so we can only assume he was still a bully or otherwise troubelmaker.
In short, the second version of your story adds so much to it that it almost becomes a different story. The core is the same (to the letter, as you quoted it) but the original was a horror creepypasta, while the second is a morality piece (with morality very much lacking.)
And the results are in:
Best improvement:
Baron: 2 points
Stupot: 1 point
Best story:
Baron: 2 points
Stupot: 4 points
Overall:
Baron: 4 points
Stupot: 5 points
(And this breakdown would have made so much more sense with more votes...)
And that means we have a winner by one single point.
Congratulations, Stupot!
You're up next!