Messages

Right. This:

Oh wow, damn... I was so sure...because one of the characters has a pet duck or goose and the clunky blue screen effects look about right for that era...AND there seems to be a hole leading down in the ground...

Actually, now that I look again, the blue-screened goose wouldn't have had a shadow or it would have been just an airbrushed zone under their body...

Why would a regular duck on a regular set be bluescreened anyway?

It doesn't quite look like Veronica Mars, either, but maybe?

Yes it is.

Kairo aka The Pulse?

+AudioType crossfade setting

Is it that Shannara show again? What with being this sort of post-apocalyptic fantasy and all...

I don't think this is actually it, but it reminds me of Thesis.

Woohoo! Great to have you back.

Whatever you decide you can do about these feature requests, I really do urge you to open-source the code. It's so vital to a lot of game projects that a risk of it not working or nobody being able to maintain it in the future could mean AGS isn't a viable option any more, just because of that.

It's your choice, of course. But even if nobody actually does edit the code, just knowing that in the worst case, as a fallback option, someone else could make some desperately needed fix or addition would be a huge relief. It doesn't have to be a big effort: Just picking a license and dropping the source code on Github or Bitbucket (or just zipping it up and sharing a link) is pretty quick.

Some version of The Count of Monte Cristo?

[imgzoom]https://i.imgur.com/NXIgxfJ.png[/imgzoom]

I can't see how that's not James Marsters, but there doesn't seem to be any movie in his filmography that matches.

My 2¢:

1. Allow limited discussion of any other adventure game engine (e.g. a dedicated thread), as we've always done.

2. Engines that have some sort of tie to AGS or this community, as "spiritual successor" or whatever, can be accepted on par with AGS e.g. for Games in Production, as long as:
-the engine is freely available to anyone (non-commercial), ideally open-source
-it is mature enough to be a viable choice for completing an actual game, and has developer commitment for ongoing improvement
-there is actual interest in using it from someone apart from the developer (so ruling out engines custom-built for a single game)

3. For now, we stick with only allowing actual AGS games in the AGS database.

4. The rules for MAGS should be up to the organizers, maybe after a poll of participants.

Wait, is it Daredevil? I think the echo-visipn looked a little like that in the Affleck movie.

More like someone pointing a gun at another person on the ground, seen through some sort of infrared googles. Sicario?

Just my personal opinion, and I'm sure I've broken this rule myself occasionally, but I feel the game is more fun and fair if we stick to one guess per post...

Sure looks like her to me though.

I don't really see it. Plus she's not a redhead in either of those series (except when she's being Lucy in AG, but I seem to recall that's all in b&w).

Isn't Hendricks in that show with Nicole Kidman now? Big Little Lies?

That's Christina Hendricks, not Gillian Anderson.

Mad Men?

Correct